The Feminist Message In Gentlemen Prefer Blondes

A few weeks ago, due to my GWST major, I had decided to watch the movie Gentlemen Prefer Blondes starring Marilyn Monroe and Jane Russell. After thoroughly enjoying the movie, I realized that some of it’s themes were being discussed in our CSST class. One of the themes that seems evident in Marilyn’s character is Cartesian Dualism. This is the theory that the mind and body are separate. The idea that the body of a human is simply a distraction from the depths of their mind. This idea is one that could be applied to the two characters, Lorelei Lee (Marilyn Monroe) and Dorothy Shaw (Jane Russell). In Jane Russell’s character, we see that she is perceived solely as a sidekick or obstacle to the gorgeous and the blonde Lorelei. Before diving deeper, Gentlemen Prefer Blonde’s, is essentially about two showgirls who go on a trip to Europe after Lorelei gets engaged to her rich fiancé. Ms. Lee’s father-in-law, concerned about the woman’s intentions, sends a private investigator to spy on Lorelei’s whereabouts throughout the trip. Eventually, The P.I ends up falling in love with Dorothy Shaw, Lorelei’s best friend. Though being a pretty generic love story, the film does good in displaying the double standard between men and women as well as the villanization of women who value their bodies. The phrase “gold digger” that is used by men, against women (despite the fact that men have created and continue to fuel that system), is always shown in the media as a means to make an audience sympathize with a man. In many cases, this is a harmful practice. However, in the movie, Lorelei is more often than not transparent about her goals. In a conversation with her father in law, she explicitly states, “I don’t want him for his money, I want him for your money!” She uses the airheaded blonde persona that men have used to fetishize women with, in order to make men fall in love with her.

Though she’s quite intelligent and is more of a pragmatist than anyone, men refuse to see that due to how little they think of women. She, along with other women, is perceived through her beauty instead of from what lies within. More specifically, her mind and experience as women is disregarded as if she exists to be only a shiny trophy. On the flipside of that coin, Dorothy Shaw–the less desirable and more logical best friend. Though always being seen by men as this woman who is constantly overshadowed by her best friend, she is secretly a naive and sexual woman. She is the complete opposite of Lorelei: A “lover girl” with no regard for a man’s financial stability. We see her naivete when she can’t help but fall in love with the P.I, despite being made aware of his underhanded behavior. While Lorelei uses her beauty because she’s aware of its value and of the politics surrounding it, Dorothy thinks with her heart and a lustful mind. All of which is overlooked due to society’s inability to see women’s minds through their bodies though the mind is far more important.

One thought on “The Feminist Message In Gentlemen Prefer Blondes

  1. I really like that you point out how men are typically ‘allowed’ and even encouraged to value their bodies in this context, while women are scrutinized for daring to value and wholly appreciate themselves. Within nearly any context where double standards about gender are found, it seems to be a situation where society is upset that the person deemed an ‘object’ is acting out of her own free will instead of remaining within the box that society wishes her to stay confined to. The confines of the social norm ‘box’ have been twisted into a form of supposed ‘biological’ normality so that those who refute expectations are not only committing a faux pas but also defying the fallacious concept that such norms are biologically determined. Iris Marion Young mentions the various philosophers who attribute women’s actions and general demeanors to ‘biology,’ and numerous philosophers, such as Michel Foucault, simultaneously state that men are able to ‘create’ themselves without any such restrictions. The P.I., the father-in-law, and even random men in the background are whole people, with their bodies and minds combined, yet the minds and bodies of the stars of this film are separated. Although they are seen as intelligent and autonomous, their bodies are still considered first rather than concurrently. Great post!

Leave a comment